UNAKITE
A. Unakite
polished paper weight (width - 6.7 cm) from the type area in the Unaka
range of the Southern Blue Ridge Province near the Tennessee-North
Carolina line. This piece was given to me by my dear friend Anna
Jonas Stose (1881-1974), who mapped the geology of much of the southern
Blue Ridge Province. R.V. Dietrich
collection. (© photo by Dick
Dietrich)
B. Unakite.
Polished gemstones (large cabochon, greater axis - 3.7 cm) fashioned
from material
from Augusta County, Virginia. This material has a so-to-speak intermediate grain size and
contains more epidote per unit volume than the specimen shown in
"A." As indicated by the faceted
stones (upper left and right), some masses of alkali
feldspar and epidote within the rock from this locality (and from several
other
localities!) are large enough
to
yield cut stones that consist wholly, or nearly so, of only epidote or
alkali
feldspar. The small cabachons are arranged to show different
percentages of the two constituents -- left to right the feldspar
content decreases as the epidote content increases.
R.V. Dietrich collection. (© photo by Dick
Dietrich)
USES: Beads (tumbled pieces as well as spheres and other fashioned shapes); tumbled chips, cabochons, faceted, freeforms and scarabs for jewelry -- in particular for relatively large pieces in which one can see the contrasting green and pink constituents to best advantage, but also in rings; eggs, spheres, pyramids, hearts, wands and palmstones; carvings, both small for such things as pendants and larger for curios; small boxes and other containers; paperweights; etc. Some unakite has been used as tile -- e.g., on the main terrace of the National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian Institution) in Washington, D.C.
OCCURRENCES: Unakite per se occurs as parts of granitic masses -- commonly small masses such as dikes and lenses -- that have undergone epidotization, with the epidote representing diverse alteration and/or replacement processes; it also as cobbles and pebbles in unconsolidated sediments derived at least in part from such masses. The above described virtually quartz-free unakite-like rocks have, I suspect, several diverse origins, none of which I have seen described well enough professional publications to warrant summarizing herein.
REMARKS: Unakite was named for
occurrences in the Unaka range of the Great Smoky region in the Blue
Ridge province of eastern Tennessee and western North Carolina by
Bradley (1874), who called it "Unakyte, an epidotic rock." (I
suspect his Bradley's use of the -yte suffix, rather than the -ite
suffix was in
deference to J.D. Dana's suggestion that such could be used to
distinguish rock names from mineral names.) However, as
mentioned under the DESCRIPTION
subheading, this designation has been extended (dishonored?) -- especially in the market place
--
to include several rocks that are characterized by deep salmon colored
feldspar and green epidote but contain little, if any, quartz.
Although I would prefer that these
virtually quartz-free rocks be called unakite-like or, at least,
"unakite," I feel sure this will not come
to pass. So, it seems that we shall have to live with unakites and
unakites that differ from accepted nomenclature usage.
A lesson for collectors: I still bear a scar from a deep cut and loss of much blood suffered from a small flying disc broken from a student's apparently improperly tempered hammer while she was trying to get a good sample of unakite from the Airpoint mass southwest of Roanoke, Virginia. Indeed, several years later, an operation was necessary to remove the metal disc. The important aspect of this story is that several good samples were loose on the ground adjacent to the exposure, just so-to-speak waiting to be collected -- i.e. no hammering was required to get good specimens. So, I mention this episode to emphasize two things: 1.Fine specimens are often loose, and thus readily available, near outcrops and road cuts. and 2.One should always be extremely careful when using hammers, chisels, and other tools to remove rocks from exposures or, I should add, even when breaking pieces of loose rubble.
According to
information supplied
me by those familiar with efforts to establish official state
minerals,
rocks, and gemstones for Virginia,
listings
of unakite as the state gemstone of Virginia (e.g., on the web
site
www.jackgolightly.com) are erroneous. And, I suspect the same can
be said about listings of unakite as the "official stone" for South
Carolina (e.g., on web
site wwwdesigner.cabs.com).
SIMULANTS: None that I have seen or seen described.
REFERENCES: No general reference. VanLandingham, 1962, pts.3 & 4; Owens, 1977.R. V. Dietrich © 2007
Revised: October 31, 2005
web page created by Emmett Mason